The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
best one Option #1: Part I. Code of Ethics and Reflection Paper The Portfolio Project for this course is comprised of two parts. You must complete both Part I and Part II. Ethics and social responsibility affect every business manager. Imagine you are hired as a human resources manager and the company does not have a code of ethics. Your first duty in your new position as HR manager is to develop a code of ethics. Address the following in drafting your code of ethics: Write for your industry. If you are not currently involved in any industry, choose a hypothetical industry. Consider various types of ethics: moral, personal, societal, business and professional. Your code does not have to address all, but it certainly may. Include a mission statement to set forth the purpose of your code clearly. Be clear regarding how your code of ethics is to be followed. It is not enough that your policies are stated; what must the employee do to follow them? What is the mechanism for reporting ethical violations? What is the consequence for violating the code? Address various areas of employment law covered in this course as they relate to the ethical conduct of the employee. These areas may include:discrimination harassment employee privacy collective bargaining cyberlaw issues criminal behavior of the employee during the scope of employment crimes committed by employee outside the scope of employment (i.e., not “on the job”) conflicts of interest intellectual property compliance with work policies generally confidentiality product or service integrity health and safety money handling corporate veil protection, or lack thereof effect of any agency relationship contract negotiations tortious conduct generally any other employee rights This list is not exhaustive, nor must you address everything on the list. These are some examples of topics you as a human resources manager must anticipate in drafting a code of ethics. Be sure to address ethical conduct as it relates to employees’ interactions with one another and with the company as well as employee interactions as they affect society generally (e.g., customers, environment, international effects). Include a brief conclusion. Some companies have a code of ethics that is only one page long. However, it is recommended that you anticipate any legal issues that may arise and this can require a lengthier code of ethics. As such, your well-written code of ethics should be 6-8 pages long and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements Part II. Analysis and Evaluation: Implementation of the Code of Ethics and Maintaining Ongoing Ethical Conduct In Part II of the Portfolio Project, you will analyze and evaluate the effects of your code. In your well-written assessment, identify and discuss the theory of corporate social responsibility demonstrated in your code. Also discuss how putting this code in place will affect your company. What problems may be associated with implementing the code of ethics? What do you as human resources manager need to anticipate regarding implementation problems? Reflect also on the impact beyond your company. How will this code of ethics affect the business world generally? What effects, if any, will it have on society and the international legal environment? Furthermore, what will you do as HR manager to ensure the code is complied with consistently? Said differently, it is not enough on the part of the HR manager to secure signed codes. What are some problems with implementing a code of ethics? What can and will you do to remind the employees of the required ethical conduct in your business? What exceptions will you make, if any, for violations of the code? Your Part II paper should be 5-6 pages long and formatted according to APA Requirements. Cite a minimum of four sources in addressing the problems associated with implementation of the code and maintaining compliance with the code. You should submit Part I and Part II as one document. Week 4 Deliverable due today. A draft of your code of ethics will be due in Week 4. Submit your bibliography of resources as well as an outline to your instructor for review. Be sure to touch base with your instructor early in the week if you have any questions or concerns about this assignment. NOTE: Although you will not earn points in Week 4 for this deliverable, it is a required component of the Portfolio Project, and you will lose points on your final project grade if you fail to submit this assignment as required by the end of Week 4. See the Portfolio Project grading rubric on the Course Information page for details. vr, Cynthia HRM515: Portfolio Project Rubric Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Portfolio Milestone 33-40 Points 25-32 Points 17-24 Points 9-16 Points Portfolio Milestone Submitted Week 4 Submitted Portfolio Milestone assignment in Week 4, as specified in the assignment. Submitted Portfolio Milestone assignment in Week 4 with significant but not major errors or omissions. Submitted Portfolio Milestone assignment in Week 4 with major errors or omissions. Did not submit specification Portfolio Milestone assignment in Week 4. Part I 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Requirements Part I includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Part I includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Part I includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Part I includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Content Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials, including a thorough understanding of ethical and social issues a business can face including termination litigation and international laws; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Analysis and Synthesis Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, synthesis and analysis of elements and concepts included in code of ethics. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis. Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, synthesis and analysis. Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, synthesis and analysis. 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Incorporation of Instructor Feedback Strongly or adequately addresses all instructor feedback from the Portfolio Deliverable in Week 4 into the final Portfolio submission. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in addressing instructor feedback. Major errors or omissions in addressing instructor feedback. Fails to address instructor feedback in Part I of the final Portfolio submission. Part II 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Requirements Part II includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Part II includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Part II includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Part II includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. HRM515: Portfolio Project Rubric 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Content Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials including potential issues associated with implementing a code of ethics; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 33-40 Points 25-32 Points 17-24 Points 9-16 Points Analysis Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of issues that may arise in implementing the code of ethics. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis. Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis. Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis. 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Synthesis and Evaluation Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in recommendations for implementing code of ethics and ensuring ongoing compliance. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation. Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation. Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation. 21 -25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Sources Cites and integrates at least four credible sources. Cites and integrates three credible sources. Cites and integrates two credible sources. Cites and integrates one or no credible sources. 21 -25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Application of Source Material Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material. Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources. Major problems with selection and linkage of sources. Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course. Mechanics and Writing 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Organization Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements. Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements. Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements. Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements. HRM515: Portfolio Project Rubric 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Grammar and Style Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few and minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments. Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations. Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity. 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Demonstrates proper use of APA style Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error. Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors. Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSUGlobal Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors. Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSUGlobal Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors. Total points possible = 350 for Week 4 Deliverable due today. A draft of your code of ethics will be due in Week 4. Submit your bibliography of resources as well as an outline to your instructor for review. Be sure to touch base with your instructor early in the week if you have any questions or concerns about this assignment. NOTE: Although you will not earn points in Week 4 for this deliverable, it is a required component of the Portfolio Project, and you will lose points on your final project grade if you fail to submit this assignment as required by the end of Week 4. As such, your well-written code of ethics should be 6-8 pages long and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements due in two weeks. A A draft of your code of ethics will be due in Week 4. Submit your bibliography of resources as well as an outline to your instructor for review. in two weeks well-written code of ethics should be 6-8 pages long and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements due in two weeks. a draft of code of ethics is due today Week 4 Deliverable due today. A draft of your code of ethics will be due in Week 4. Submit your bibliography of resources as well as an outline to your instructor for review. Be sure to touch base with your instructor early in the week if you have any questions or concerns about this assignment. NOTE: Although you will not earn points in Week 4 for this deliverable, it is a required component of the Portfolio Project, and you will lose points on your final project grade if you fail to submit this assignment as required by the end of Week 4. See the Portfolio Project grading rubric on the Course Information page for details.
Read less
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more