The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Assessment Criteria Suggested word limit: 1000 words (10%) Due Date: 21st August 2017 Important Please note: 1. Any assignments where plagiarism or collusion is detected will be awarded a mark of zero. You will need to contact your tutor if you wish to discuss this. 2. Failure to upload the correct document to the assessment link will result in late penalties being applied to documents which are later submitted for marking of that assignment. Assessment Description For weeks 3, 4 and 5, e-Learning materials have been uploaded to Blackboard (see ‘E-learning Activities’ menu for these weekly activities) for review and application. Week 3 – What is Strategy Watch the video on the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD7WSLeQtVw (8:47) Week 4 – Business Model Innovation Watch the video on the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4ZSGQW0UMI (8:22) Week 5 – CAGE framework Watch the video on the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FpUJaG7uMk (2:25 Choose two examples of organizations that are widely regarded as excellent in their industry (DO NOT use any of the organizations discussed in the online clips provided as your selected examples). Define (Why excellent?): Bottom line (Total revenue- cost) Market share Ethics Environmental/ social responsibility Theories: Entrepreneur Business model For eg. Apple: ios, innovation, entrepreneurship Practical source of the excellence: Marketing Supply chain Finance Based on the online clips and the theories they cover, identify the source(s) of each individual organisations excellence in turn, paying particular attention to the roles of the various theories in achieving that excellence. Recommended Structure For each organisation (500 words per organisation), prepare 2 paragraphs: Paragraph 1: A brief description of the organisation, justification for why you have selected it and why it is perceived as being excellent in its field (100 words). Paragraph 2: A description of how this organisation has achieved its current standing in the market by applying the theory(ies) discussed in the online clips (400 words) Format: Report format Executive summary Table of content Body (as mentioned above) Conclusion Bbiliography Assessment Guidelines Students should consult the marking rubric (see below) to see exactly what is required and how your assignment will be marked. You should enrich this assignment with ideas from other materials such as journal articles. This additional research will be necessary to obtain the best marks. All ideas in the report must be referenced using Harvard Referencing (in-text citations and full references at the back). Individual Assignment 1 Fail 50-60 60-70 70-80 80+ Description of Inappropriate choice of Identified and described one Identified and described Identified and described Identified and described appropriate organisation /5 organisations/ poorly described/no organisations identified suitable organisation with some clarity two suitable organisations with some clarity two suitable organisations clearly two suitable organisation clearly with clear justification for selection Application of Theory Understanding and Limited attempt at relating Shows awareness of theory Good attempt at applying In-depth, insightful application of theory to theory to organisations with reasonable attempt to theory to both organisations discussion of theory and organisations is unclear and apply it to both how it links to the demonstrates a lack of organisations, though, organisations in question. /8 understanding of the material. largely descriptive Presentation, No relevant references/Few Some relevant references A reasonable set of relevant A good choice of relevant Excellent selection of quantity and quality of References relevant references/ Referencing is unclear or poorly structured and mainly drawn from one type of source. Referencing clear but inconsistent references, from more than one type of source with clear referencing of all references from more than one type of source, with at least one journal article. relevant references from a variety of good sources presented in clear formatted sources Systematic referencing systematic format method /3 Formatting, Poorly presented, no Limited attempt at Page numbering, front Good attempt at report Excellent attempt at Structure and approach apparent structure and/or confused writing style formatting, Well structured, clear writing style cover, bibliography with some attempt at formatting. Well structured, focus formatting incorporating all elements at credits level. Clear focus, structure and formatting report. Focus clear and justified, structure and style used to emphasise explicit and clear, style style used to emphasise argument and discussion appropriate discussion /4
Read less
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more