The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
I would like the writer to follow the guideline for the assignment based on the marking rubric attached below. In the lab report assignment, we are going to examine the effectiveness of two methods in reducing DRM false memories: 1. Identify-to-reject: When participants are exposed to the word lists, they are instructed to try and figure out what the critical lure words are (identify them) so they can later say those words did not appear in the list (reject) Discussed in Carneiro et al. (2012) 2. Imagery: When participants are exposed to the word lists, they are instructed to try and visually imagine each word on the list in an elaborate way (i.e., doing something) ? Discussed in Oliver et al. (2016) But in the paper i was delivered only Carneiro et al. (2012) was talked in detail. You have been provided with two readings on to assist you with writing your introduction: Carneiro et al. (2012): Identify-to-reject: A specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm. Oliver et al. (2016): False memories and the DRM paradigm: effects of imagery, list, and test type . ? Both readings MUST be cited in your introduction ? You do NOT need to find any additional readings ? If you wish to, you can cite studies from these two papers as though you have read them (but you dont need to read them). For example, you could cite the Brainerd, Reyna, Wright, and Mojardin (2003) paper, which is mentioned in Carneiro et al. (2012), as Brainerd et al. (2003). You do NOT have to cite it as a secondary citation; that is, Brainerd et al. (2003 as cited in Carneiro et al. (2012). The paragraphing of the introduction should follow as below. Paragraph 1 The introduction to a laboratory report should provide a broad overview to the area and generate interest. Some information to include here is: What are DRM false memories and what is the procedure used to study them? What are the underlying mechanisms that create DRM false memories occur? Why is it important to know about methods that can reduce DRM false memories? Paragraph 2 : One of the three conditions in the current study is Imagery. So it is important we tell the reader what this is and what we know about this so far. Some things to cover here include: *Aim *Two theories describing how imagery might affect DRM false memories *Method & participants *Results (recognition ONLY) *Implications *Limitations relevant to our study Paragraph 3 One of the three conditions in the current study is identify-to-reject. So it is important we tell the reader what this is and what we know about this so far. Some things to cover here include: *Aim *Definitions identifiability effect, identify-toreject *Expt 1: method & participants, results *Expt 2: method & participants, results (for both experiments, focus on recognition ONLY) *Implications Paragraph 4 The gap in the literature that we are filling with our study (i.e., what we are doing) The aim of our study Two hypotheses about DRM false memories (Provide two hypotheses about false memories o 1 hypothesis for imagery & 1 hypothesis for identify-to-reject) *Note: No hypothesis should directly compare the two methods** Our participants complete the standard DRM false memory procedure. But first they were randomly allocated to only see one of three instructions: Control Group: Only told what the study would involve (e.g., 5 word lists, recognition test at the end) Identify-to-reject: Given the same instructions as the control group, but also told what a critical lure word was and to try and identify it so they didnt falsely recognise it in the recognition test Imagery: Also given the same instructions as the control, but told to try and imagine each word as it appeared and then imagine it doing something (e.g., imagine a fox and then try to imagine it running under a fence)
Read less
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more