The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
I believe that rebuilding the lives of an established community helps victims rebuild their trust in the civic leaders to help restore what was lost of their lives. However, I must argue that, placing families back into the path of destruction is irresponsible. In contrast, I can’t help but recall the devastation of Joplin, Missouri on May, 22, 2011 when an EF-5 tornado destroyed a portion of the town. Joplin, MS is located in a region of the United States that is known for is destructive incidents from man-made earthquakes to natural disastrous tornado’s. Accordingly, Elnser, et al. (2016) observed that tornado’s occur randomly […] implicit research shows that thunderstorms can be forecast unfortunately they are a derivative of tornado’s that can’t be, as a result of their randomness (2016). This is why I put forth the notion of responsible rebuilding out of the path of know areas or tornado zones. Elnser, et al. (2016) identified the two states of Texas and Kansas who have at least 2 tornado’s per 10,000 square kilometers. So, the question is, how do you protect families while rebuilding their lives from known tornado zones. Phillips (2015, p.183) suggest, a good alternative in trying to rebuild historical structures after a catastrophic incident is to 1) assess support, develop a team engage the public, 2) complete a risk assessment (p.183). The people who live, work and play in that affected community will be affected again if one of their historical landmark is not replaced.
The first, issue is the loss of financial resources ,taxes and revenue, these economic benefits that are associated with that historical marker. People come to towns and villages throuhout the entire world to visit places that ads value to their culture. For example, I visited Windsor Castle, in 2009 after the catastrophic fire of 1992 that destroyed a large portion Queen Elizabeth’s home in Windsor, UK. Also, I visited the World Trade Center in July of 2001, just before going off the to the University at Buffalo for my first semester of college. Windsor Castle was rebuilt in 1998 (Emerald, 1998) due to a fire started by a work light that ignited a drape in the chapel. Because the Castle was nearly one thousand years old, needless to say it did not have applicable fire safety installations (1998). After the five year project was complete, Windsor Castle, a major tourist attraction for the city of Windsor was equipped with modern fire detectors (Emerald, 1998, p.2). The fire detection system in link to a central command station in the Castle with over 550 detectors 14 aspirators and infrared radar to detect temperature variations (1998, p.3). Restoring this historical landmark, brings needed financial resources back to a community that provides work and income for many residents and business.
Second, the emotional attachment or Communal ties (Phillips, 2015, p.169), which have meaning to the people of the community. This is what makes people want to stay in their prospective communities, because of these ties. This is why it was so difficult for administrators to “either rebuild in situ, relocate […] consequently, there are no good models for planner and policymakers to follow when disasters force resettlement” (Iuchi, 2015, p.413). This suggest that people do have strong communal ties want to remain in their familiar location reguardless of the recurrent danger that may exist in all hazardous incidents.
Elsner, J.B., Jagger, T.H.,and Fricker, T. (2016). Statistical Models for Tornado Climatology: Long and Short-Term Views, PLOS ONE, Retrieved From Walden University
Emerald Group Publishing (1998). Windsor Castle after the fire, Emerald Insight, Facilities. Vol. 16 Issue: 3/4 Retrieved from Walden University Library, Emerald Publishing Group Limited
Iuchi, K. (2015). Planning Resettlement After Disasters. Journal of the American Planning Association, Autumn 2014, Vol. 80, no.4 pp. 413-415, 14p. Retrieved from Walden University Library.
Phillips, B.D. (2015) Disaster Recovery, Second Edition. Historic and Cultural Resources Chapter 6, p.163-193
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more