The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
Topic: Annotated Bibliography
Assessment Description
In the previous assignment, learners identified primary quantitative research for their PICOT-D question and intervention. The purpose of this assignment is to create an annotated bibliography to inform on the relevance of the selected articles. The purpose of this assignment is to present the final primary quantitative research for your future DPI Project (based on the PICOT-D question).
General Requirements:
· Refer to the “Literature Evaluation Table” completed in your Topic 4 assignment. (ATTACHED)
· Refer to “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies” resource (ATTACHED). This resource provides criteria for other types of scholarly writing, so make sure you follow the APA style criteria.
· A minimum of six primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of your anticipated graduation date, are required to complete this assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use the 7th APA style for their writing assignments. T
· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite for Plagiarism check.
Directions:
For this assignment, create an annotated bibliography (APA 7th) to inform the reader on the six primary quantitative research articles identified on your “Literature Evaluation Table.” Include the following:
1. If any of the five original articles submitted on your “Literature Evaluation Table” fail to meet the required criteria, or if you have been instructed to replace or revise the articles, make these changes prior to beginning this assignment. Two of the five articles must provide direct support for your proposed intervention.
2. For each annotation, concisely discuss your evaluation of the article’s quality, accuracy, and relevance to your PICOT-D. When discussing relevance, explain how the research directly supports the PICOT-D question or intervention.
3. Attach the updated “Literature Evaluation Table” to an appendix in this new assignment.
INSTRUCTOR’S FEEDBACK FROM THE LAST SUBMITTED Literature Evaluation Table
You have a good start, but you still have a lot of work to do on your PICOT. For this assignment you needed to include at least 5 articles. You have only three.
Your article does not support an intervention. It speaks of research related to mental health resources. You need to find a study with a validated intervention that you can implement. You needed to include 5 studies for this activity.
Three articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of the articles contains numerous inaccuracies. It is unclear how the research articles, and clinical practice guidelines support the intervention.
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more