The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
This week you will gather the last four articles pertinent to your research problem and discuss attributes surrounding the problem and your investigation of the problem. You will again present the studies as a synthesized review in the discussion board. Your completed synthesized Literature Review assignment is due in Workshop Six day seven.
Upon successful completion of this assignment you should be able to:
Research questions often change during the search for current research articles related to the problem. According to Ling Pan (2016), a search which nets a large number of articles may warrant a narrowing of the question; and a search which nets only a handful of articles may call for a broader question. There may be other influences as well, i.e., when a previously thoroughly researched topic is now outdated. Some problems may be acknowledged in the literature, yet there are no current studies addressing the problem or subproblems. Do not hesitate to contact the OCLS reference librarian, Jule Kind as needed. Be sure and use the databases in the OCLS and request help so that you get the literature you need. Also, it is not uncommon to revise the study question as needed to better target the problem.
Navigate to the threaded discussion here.
Criteria
15 Points
12 Points
9 Points
6 Points
Quality
Your postings are well developed and answers provide clear evidence of critical thinking.
Your questions or observations add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
Your postings show some development and some critical thinking is evident in your answers.
Your questions and observations add to the discussion by expanding the ideas of others.
Your postings show nominal development and only the beginnings of critical thinking.
Your contributions (questions or observations) do not clearly add to the discussion.
Your postings show no development and are mostly a reiteration of what the textbook or others have said.
Your questions and observations detract from the discussion.
Criteria
6 points
5 Points
3 Points
0 Points
Timeliness
Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is made by day five of the workshop.
Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is made by the day six of the workshop.
Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is made by day seven of the workshop.
No initial post was made.
Criteria
9 Points
6 Points
3 Points
0 Points
Interaction
You respond to a minimum of two other classmates as well as all follow-up faculty questions directed to you.
You are clearly collaborative by taking the initiative to respond to classmates’ questions, providing clarification and insight on issues in the discussion.
You respond to two classmates and some of the faculty follow-up questions directed to you.
You are collaborative in some situations and show some initiative in workshop discussions.
You respond to two classmates but do not respond to faculty follow-up questions directed to you.
You show little initiative in discussions and your presence is not collaborative.
You do not respond to the postings of others in the discussion.
Criteria
25 Points
19 Points
14 Points
9 Points
Spreadsheet of Articles Reviewed
Information for all four studies is complete. Accurate. Current. Well targeted. Peer reviewed.
Few missing items or information not fully reflective of the article. Current. Closely targeted. Peer reviewed.
Missing items. Or less than four articles. Information not fully reflective of the article. Outdated. Marginally targeted. Peer reviewed.
Information incomplete or less than four articles. Information not fully reflective of the article. Outdated. Does not address topic.
Criteria
25 Points
19 Points
14 Points
9 Points
Spreadsheet of Research Study Analysis
Information for all four studies is complete. Accurate. Current. Well targeted. Peer reviewed.
Few missing items or information not fully reflective of the article. Current. Closely targeted. Peer reviewed.
Missing items. Or less than four articles. Information not fully reflective of the article. Outdated. Marginally targeted. Peer reviewed.
Information incomplete or less than four articles. Information not fully reflective of the article. Outdated. Does not address topic.
Total Points
8
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more