The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
Because of the great differences between HIT systems and different goals of an evaluation, there is no one-size-fits-all evaluation plan. Different technologies require different evaluation methods. Consequently, in this part of the Evaluation Plan Project, there is a need to conduct research on how system implementations prevent errors, enhance the quality, and efficiency of health systems. Select one research goal and viewpoint to use in the evaluation.
In a 4-page documentation:
· Identify which of the cases from the text, will be evaluated in this project, summarize the case, and explain why the selected system featured in the case.
· Next, summarize your three research findings on similar HIT implementations. Include the models, evaluation methods, findings, and plans for reevaluation in each article.
· Critique the HIT implementations: Identify successful and unsuccessful elements of the implementations. Explain the reasons for the successful elements. Identify areas for improvement and explain why (or how) they could be improved.
· Create an evaluation goal and identify the viewpoint related to the goal that will guide your own evaluation plan. Provide a rationale for choosing that goal and viewpoint.
Reference
Abbasi-moghaddam, M. A., Zarei, E., Bagherzadeh, R., Dargahi, H., & Farrokhi, P. (2019). Evaluation of service quality from patients’ viewpoint. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi:10.1186/s12913-019-3998-0
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
Brender, J. (2006). Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics. Elsevier Academic Press
Carayon, P., Smith, P., Hundt, A., Kuruchittham, V., & Li, Q. (2009). Implementation of an electronic health records system in a small clinic: the viewpoint of clinic staff. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701628178
Cho, H. Yen, P. Dowding, D., Merril, J., & Schnall, R. (2018, October). A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 86, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012
Hamann, D. J., & Bezboruah, K. C. (2020). Outcomes of health information technology utilization in nursing homes: Do implementation processes matter? Health Informatics Journal, 26(3), 2249–2264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219899556
Huang, Y.-H., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2016). Recommendations for health information technology implementation in rural hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance (09526862), 29(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2015-0115
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more