The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
In this Discussion, you examine scenarios that feature workflow issues related to the HITECH Act and its meaningful use objectives. You identify specific workflow gaps and consider how you would conduct a gap analysis to gather more information about the gaps. This Discussion allows you to explore workflow gaps and meaningful use objectives to prepare you for completing the Course Project, which is also centered on workflow gaps and their relevance to meaningful use objectives
General Health Hospital is implementing new outreach programs and preventive care support groups for patients with certain conditions or health risks such as diabetes, smoking, and obesity. Philip, a nurse leader, is the manager of a team of nurses who have been asked to organize these programs and groups and to identify patients who would be eligible for and interested in being involved in these opportunities. However, Philip and his team have run into a variety of challenges and problems as they attempt to complete these tasks. In identifying patients to contact about the outreach programs and support groups, Philip’s team has had to browse the hospital’s EHR system. The team has also run across significant holes in the EHR system as they try to contact patients; many patients’ contact information is inaccurate or out of date. Furthermore, Philip’s team has partnered with the hospital’s Appointments Desk personnel in sending reminders about meeting dates and times to patients who express interest. However, the Appointments Desk often either neglects to send out these reminders or sends duplicate reminders to only a few patients because the personnel do not have a way of tracking who should be contacted and when.
To prepare
Your Instructor will have assigned you to respond to a specific scenario. Review this week’s Learning Resources on workflow, gap analysis, and meaningful use, and consider how they connect to the scenario you were assigned.
Post by tomorrow Tuesday 9/13/16, 550 words essay in APA format with a minimum of 3 references from the list provided below. Include the level 1 headings as numbered below:
1) An explanation of the most prominent workflow gap in the scenario you were assigned, including who is responsible for the gap and the outcomes or consequences.
2) Identify the meaningful use objective to which the gap relates, citing specific points in the Brown article. (See Attached File)
3) Explain how you would conduct a gap analysis to gather further information and determine strategies for addressing the gap.
Required Readings
Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Roth, R. M. (2015). Systems analysis and design (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
This chapter describes the organizational steps involved in selecting an appropriate IT project, creating a viable project plan, and finally, managing and controlling the project once it is implemented.
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Better clinical outcomes, increased efficiency and improved care coordination are a few of the benefits afforded by the use of electronic medical records. In this chapter, the authors illustrate how nurses are actively supporting, developing and utilizing informatics to improve patient care and fulfill meaningful use standards by improving workflow in their respective health care organizations.
Brown, B. (2010). 25 steps to meaningful use. Journal of Health Care Compliance, 12(3), 33–34, 68–69.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
As part of the implementation of the HITECH initiative, three different stages of implementation have been outlined. This article dissects the first phase and describes the different steps health care organizations must achieve to be in compliant with the meaningful use standards.
Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(6), 501–504.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
The authors explain HITECH’s objective in creating the meaningful use policies in order to help create a consistently high quality nationwide system of EHRs. The article reviews the key regulations that are tied to meaningful use and what they mean to health care organizations.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Meaningful use: Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ehrmeaningfuluse/introduction.html
This page offers an overview of meaningful use as outlined in the HITECH initiative. It highlights the rationale behind the meaningful use standards and how they relate to health outcomes policy priorities.
Healthcare Financial Management Association. (2008). Gap analysis helps nurses become better leaders. Retrieved from http://www.hfma.org/Content.aspx?id=3398
This article presents how gap analysis aids in optimizing unit performance and management. By examining a real-life example of how gap analysis was employed in this study, the authors demonstrate its real-world applications and benefits.
HealthIT.gov. (n.d.). Meaningful use. Retrieved January 2, 2014, from http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/meaningful-use
The meaningful use initiative is part of the governmental agenda to further advance the use of electronic health records in the health care community. This article outlines the conditions and projected timeline of meaningful use’s national implementation.
Required Media
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012a). A discussion on meaningful use. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 7 minutes.
This audio interview provides an overview of the meaningful use component of the HITECH law and how it affects the use of electronic health records.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more