The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Assessment One Part A:
of the following cases to read and summarise.
Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292
Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162
Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services (NT) v JWB and SMB (Marion’s Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218
A Solicitor v Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253
Briefly outline the procedural history, material facts, legal issues and judgment/s (reasons for the decision and dissenting judgments if there are any). Is the case still current law? If so, give an example of how it has been applied since.
(1000 words: 25%)
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more