Expert_researcher 2nd class | Nursing homework help

Is the same project, we were suppose to start working since week 1  

Project: Group Presentation on Nursing Theorist

Overview of the Project

This course project requires you to complete a group task. As a group, you are required to submit a presentation on the theorist assigned to your group. Your final presentation is due in Week 4.

Group Formation

You will be organized into three groups, each of which will be assigned a nursing theorist. The theorists to be studied include, but are not limited to, Madeline Leininger—Transcultural Nursing Theory, Nola Pender; the Health Promotion Model, and Patricia Benner; From Novice to Expert, the Skill Acquisition ModelIf your group would like to study a different theorist, seek permission from your instructor. Each group will conduct a literature review to obtain material related to the assigned theorist and the model. The material should include research conducted in the theory or model, with clinical examples.

Click here to download a document that provides guidelines for the literature review.

Project Deliverables

The Project Deliverables include the following:

1. Packet of Materials

Each group will prepare a packet of materials that will be posted to the DQ sectionin Week 4 for peer critique and submitted to the W4: Assignment 2 Dropbox.The purpose of this packet is to support your PowerPoint Presentation. The packet should include a detailed outline of the presentation and a one-page summary of each of the five relevant articles on or about the theory. Also include any handouts, such as charts, diagrams, or definitions, which will facilitate understanding of the PowerPoint presentation and the theory itself. This packet should be submitted as a single document that contains the outline, summaries, and any additional handouts, charts, etc.

2. Power Point Presentation

Presentations will be made via PowerPoint and will be uploaded by the assigned due date.

Your presentation should have:

  • A brief overview of the theorist’s background.
  • Discussion of the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory.
  • The basic theoretical assertions or propositions.
  • An analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research.

Click here to download the Theory Critique template.

Please note: It is expected that each one of you will download and read each presentation, and will include relevant material about each theorist in your individual concept papers.

Working Ahead

In Week 1, your group will be assigned the theorist on whom you have to make the presentation. Your final group presentation is due in Week 4. However, it is recommended that in Week 2 you submit the work you have done on the project up to that point to the facilitator when necessary. The facilitator feedback will help you revise and refine the work already completed and apply the facilitator recommendations to the yet-to-be completed part of the project.

For ease of completion, it is suggested that in Week 1, you begin your literature search on the theorist and provide a brief overview of the theorist’s background. You could also complete a 1-page summary for each  of the five articles related to the theory and theorist, the top of the page should have the complete reference in APA format. In Week 2, you can focus on providing your findings on the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms . In Week 3, you can concentrate on providing the basic theoretical assertions or propositions and you can conduct an analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research. ByTuesday, September 27, 2016, collate the work that you have done so far and submit your final project in the prescribed format to the W4: Assignment 2 Dropbox.

Due Dates

By Tuesday, September 27, 2016 you will submit your packet and presentation in the prescribed format to the W4: Assignment 2 Dropbox and Discussion Question area for peer critique. 

By Wednesday, September 28, 2016 you will evaluate at least two peer group presentations making use of the criteria provided in the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template.

Click here to download the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template.

Members of the group will be graded collectively. Grading of the presentation of the theory/conceptual model will be based on the following scale for each element:

 

Group Project Presentation on Nursing Theorist

Your group presentation on the selected nursing theorist is due this week and has two parts. By Tuesday, September 27, 2016, collaborate with your group members and collate the project-related work that you have done from Weeks 1–4, and submit your group project in the prescribed format as noted below.

Your Project Deliverables include the following:

1. Packet of Materials

A packet of materials should be posted to the Discussion Area for peer critique and submitted to the W4: Assignment 2 Dropbox. The packet should include a detailed outline of the PowerPoint presentation and a one-page summary of each of five relevant articles on or about the theory and at the top of the page should have the complete reference in APA format. It should also include any handouts, such as charts, diagrams, or definitions, which will facilitate understanding of the PowerPoint presentation and the theory itself.

2. PowerPoint Presentation

Your PowerPoint presentation should be uploaded to the appropriate Discussion Area section of for this week.

Your presentation should have:

  • A brief overview of the theorist’s background.
  • Discussion of the theorist’s view of the four basic concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and two other concepts unique to the theory
  • The basic theoretical assertions or propositions.
  • An analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research.

On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, evaluate at least two peer group presentations making use of the criteria provided in the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template.

Click here to download the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template.

Post your critiques for the group project presentation to the Discussion Questionarea where the PowerPoint Presentation and Packets are posted.

Please note: It is expected that each one of you will download and read each presentation.

Grading Criteria:

Maximum
Points

Group Formation

 

Students formed effective groups and the group demonstrated signs of cooperation thereby facilitating the learning process.

6

Project Deliverables

 

The packet of materials included a detailed outline of the presentation and a one-page summary of each of five relevant articles on or about the theory.

8

The selected articles reflected research into the historical perspective of the theory.

6

Selection of the articles reflected breadth of research into the theory and its utilization and evaluation.

6

Summary was articulate and included the entire article.

6

Summary clearly described the author’s perspective.

6

Editorial/personal response demonstrated critical thinking.

6

Articles included primary, secondary, and research sources.

6

The overview of the background of the theorist demonstrated critical thinking

6

The presentation discussed the theorists view of the four basic concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and two additional concepts unique to the theory.

6

The presentation discussed the basic theoretical assertions and propositions.

6

The theory critique provided a detailed description of the chosen model.

6

The theory critique elaborated on the theory’s implications on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research.

6

The theory critique incorporated all the elements recommended in the critique template.

6

The theory critique was comprehensive and highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen nursing model.

6

Presentation included all the specified components: a brief overview of the theorist’s background, discussion of the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory, the basic theoretical assertions or propositions, and an analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research.

10

The presentation demonstrated focused research effort and good writing ability.

6

The presentation demonstrated understanding of the theory.

6

The presentation was comprehensive.

6

 The presentation style was impressive and reflected organization and clarity.

6

Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Citations and references are included and written in the correct APA Style.

10

The posted packet included handouts, such as charts, diagrams, or definitions, which facilitated understanding of the presentation and the theory.

6

Reviewed two presentations of peer groups using the criteria listed in the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template and provided an objective and unbiased feedback to the group members.

8

Total:

150

 

 

   
Calculate Your Essay Price
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more