The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
Assessment item 2a Assessment item 2a Value: 15% Due date: 04-Dec-2016 Return date: 29-Dec-2016 Length: 1000 words Submission method options Alternative submission method Task You are required to write an essay on the evolution of management theory and its relevance to contemporary workplaces using examples of organisations to illustrate each of the following theoretical concepts: Taylors scientific management Maslows hierarchy of human needs Demings Total Quality Management Go on to examine and evaluate critically the applicability of these theoretical concepts to influence managerial practices in your chosen organisations. (Look at the pros and cons) Academic and professional communication skills: You must follow an essay structure that is at a minimum an introduction; a main body that outlines the argument, analyses the material you have researched and assesses this according to the guidelines above; and a conclusion.Your writing style must follow professional literacy: Citations and a final reference list that follows the APA 6 guidelines accurately; the quality of writing and presentation: accurate mechanics (spelling, grammar, punctuation etc.); use respectful language to discuss all people; avoid emotive language; employ inclusive, non-sexist language. Use a minimum of three (3) academic journals as citations/references. In short, you will need to demonstrate an understanding and critical analysis of the concepts, as well as evaluating the practical reality in the workplace. Please refer to relevant academic literature and source materials, as well as drawing upon your knowledge of the organisation. Rationale This assignment is designed to address Learning Objectives 1 to 5 (see above) by : familiarising students with the various theories relating to organisations encouraging students to discern the strengths and weaknesses of the wide array of theoretical contributions; encouraging students to use empirical evidence to support their arguments. Marking criteria Criteria High Distinction 85-100% Distinction 75 84% Credit 65 74% Pass 50 64% Fail o- 49% Good application of appropriate theoretical concepts to organisation(s) /4 Clearly demonstrates a high level ability to synthesise theory and practice using readings and/or alternative perspectives Able to interpret the relationship between theory and practice accurately. Offers appropriate and relevant examples to support line of argument. Able to identify the relevant relationships between theory and practice. Offers some evaluation, but occasionally lack consistency. Demonstrates an adequate level of understanding relating theory to practice; and some consideration provided of alternative perspectives. Descriptive. Reproduces information from lectures and readings. The relationship between theory and practice underdeveloped and is poorly argued. Critical evaluation of these theoretical concepts and how they influence management practices in the chosen organisation. Recommendations provided if required /8 Shows deep critical reflection of and engagement. A strong and reasoned argument is made to support the recommendations. . Shows detailed critical reflection of and engagement. A strong argument is made to support the recommendations. Shows a degree of critical reflection of and engagement. Notes alternative perspectives and provides examples where necessary to support recommendations . . Examples of alternative perspectives are provided; reflection is superficial rather than meaningful. Shows a basic level of engagement. Engagement is minimal. Recommendations are reached providing no or little evidence. Writing skills and referencing Mark: /3 Excellent spelling and grammar; easy to understand; Correct use of APA6 Occasional mistakes in spelling/ grammar; easy to understand; Correct use of APA6 Some mistakes in spelling/ grammar mistakes; easy to understand; Correct use of APA6 Significant mistakes in spelling/ grammar; understandable; Some minor mistake in referencing Substantially incorrect spelling and grammar; Difficult to understand; incorrect referencing Requirements For this assessment APA referencing format is required. For guidance in the use of this referencing please see the CSU Referencing website at http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu Additional information to assist you with your assignment can be found here http://student.csu.edu.au/study/skills/guidesandtips/writing-at-uni
Read less
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more