The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Topic – Depreciation MethodsWendy is evaluationg a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $800,000 of equipment. She is unsure what Depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight line or the 3 Year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4 year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15% and 7%. The companys WACC is 10% and its tax rate is 40%.What would be the derpciation expense be each year under each method?Which depreciation method would producte the higher NPV, and how much higher would it be?
Straight lineYearPurchase priceDepreciationTax rate * depreciationFree cash flowWACCNPV3 year MACRSYearPurchase priceDepreciationTax rate * depreciationFree cash flowWACCNPV 0…
Show more
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more