The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
Assignment 2: Planning Negotiations
Worth 160 points (Due on July 21st)
You become the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and the President of the United States advises you that he doesnât want the U.S. to sign a new environmental bill. He feels it will harm well developed nations with a strong economic history and only benefit developing, or so-called âThird World,â nations.
Use the Internet to research the U.N. memberâs varying viewpoints on the new environmental bill.
Write a three (3) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 160
Assignment 2: Planning Negotiations
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapter 1-17 for handing he negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate.
Partially outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate.
Satisfactorily outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate.
Thoroughly outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely compared the United Nations memberâs stances on the new environmental bill.
Insufficiently compared the United Nations memberâs stances on the new environmental bill.
Partially compared the United Nations memberâs stances on the new environmental bill.
Satisfactorily compared the United Nations memberâs stances on the new environmental bill.
Thoroughly compared the United Nations memberâs stances on the new environmental bill.
Did not submit or incompletely examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.
Insufficiently examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Insufficiently justified your response.
Partially examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Partially justified your response.
Satisfactorily examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Satisfactorily justified your response.
Thoroughly examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Thoroughly justified your response.
4. 3 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present
7-8 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more