The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
CJ 305 Project One Guidelines and Rubric
Competency
In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:
Describe technological tools that are used in criminal justice
Scenario
As a newly hired police of�cer, you have been tasked with explaining predictive policing at an upcoming community-based meeting. You will be writing a paper to prepare for your talk. You will
share this example:
In a previous meeting, citizens in attendance discussed concerns regarding residential burglaries in their area. This live burglary crime map shows that there have reported burglaries that
appear to be close in proximity. Using data-based crime mapping and predictive policing, police established a pattern. In addition to establishing a patter, the police discovered the following:
The seven burglaries have all been forced entries with rear doors pried open.
They have occurred between Monday and Friday during business hours while residents have been at work.
Fingerprints were lifted in four of the seven houses.
Using the data, the chief has directed of�cers to stay on proactive patrols in the area between 0830 and 1330 hours on weekdays.
Note: On the top left of the Burglary Crime Map page, underneath the “Based on Crimes – Map”, click on the small arrow at the end of the “this dataset re�ects” statement to bring up more
information that describes factors that may in�uence the accuracy of the map.
Directions
Using the information from the scenario, compose a paper that analyzes predictive policing by addressing the following:
1. Describe how predictive policing is demonstrated in the scenario above. In your description, be sure to address the following:
A. What is predictive policing?
B. How do crime maps support predictive policing efforts?
C. What goals of predictive policing were achieved?
D. What types of data were used?
E. What factors were used to predict potential future criminal activities?
2. Describe additional tools of predictive policing available to law enforcement beyond what is demonstrated in this scenario. In your description, be sure to address the following:
A. What additional tools are available to law enforcement?
B. How do they work?
C. What types of data do they generate?
D. What do they accomplish?
3. Describe the pros and cons of predictive policing. In your description, be sure to address the following:
A. What are the pros for police agencies and their communities?
B. What are the cons for police agencies and their communities?
4. Identify other technology platforms available that could assist police during this investigation.
A. Identify multiple types of technologies and how they could be used.
5. Describe any case law surrounding predictive policing relevant to the scenario. In your description, be sure to address the following:
A. Where does case law limit the practice of predictive policing?
B. What concerns are raised in current lawsuits surrounding predictive policing?
C. Can bias be introduced into predictive policing?
What to Submit
To complete this project, you must submit the following:
Analyzing Predictive Policing Paper
Your paper should be 500 to 750 words in length using 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Any sources should be cited according to APA style.
Project One Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear, insightful,
sophisticated, or creative
manner
Clearly conveys meaning with
correct grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling,
demonstrating an
understanding of audience and
purpose
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, negatively
impacting readability
Submission has critical errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, preventing
understanding of ideas
15
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Predictive Policing in the
Scenario
Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear, insightful,
sophisticated, or creative
manner
Describes how predictive
policing is demonstrated in the
scenario
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may include
details on de�ning predictive
policing, explaining how crime
maps support predictive
policing, the goals of predictive
policing, the data used, or
factors used to predict future
criminal activities
Does not attempt criterion 16
Additional Tools of
Predictive Policing
Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear, insightful,
sophisticated, or creative
manner
Describes additional tools of
predictive policing available to
law enforcement beyond what
is demonstrated in the scenario
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may include
details on additional tools, how
they work, the data they
generate, and what is
accomplished
Does not attempt criterion 16
Pros and Cons Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear, insightful,
sophisticated, or creative
manner
Describes the pros and cons of
predictive policing
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may include
details on the pros or cons for
police agencies or their
communities
Does not attempt criterion 16
Other Technology Platform Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear, insightful,
sophisticated, or creative
manner
Identi�es other technology
platforms available that could
assist police during this
investigation
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may include
details on multiple types of
technology and how they could
be used
Does not attempt criterion 16
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Case Law Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear, insightful,
sophisticated, or creative
manner
Describe any case law
surrounding predictive policing
relevant to the scenario
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may include
details on case law related to
predictive policing, concerns
raised in lawsuits, or how bias
can be introduced into
predictive policing
Does not attempt criterion 16
Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas
requiring attribution, with few
or no minor errors
Uses citations for ideas
requiring attribution, with
consistent minor errors
Uses citations for ideas
requiring attribution, with
major errors
Does not use citations for ideas
requiring attribution
5
Total: 100%
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more