The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
Unlimited Attempts Allowed
Available after Jul 24, 2023 12:00amAvailable after Jul 24, 2023 12:00am
Talent Engagement Exercise
Due: Sunday, midnight of Week 6 (Weight: 15%).
Overview
Jack Welch believed effective talent management could be achieved by dividing employees into three groups: the top 20%, the middle 70%, and the bottom 10%. He used this approach to identify top talent and provide them with challenging professional assignments early in their careers.
While team leaders often know “in their gut” which employees are strong performers, a simple analysis can help you know
why they are doing well and
where you can help them to develop. The use of a Talent matrix tool can make the assessment process very powerful.
This exercise is designed to give you practical experience in using a Talent Matrix to analyze your employees’ performance, as well as their alignment with the organization’s mission and values. For each employee, you will assess their performance, consider how well they align with core values of the organization, and identify areas for improvement or professional development.
Four Quadrants Matrix
One tool used to support the Welch approach to talent management is a matrix based on four different combinations of performance and values. To prepare for this exercise, look carefully at the Four Quadrants Matrix above; then review this document:
Sample Talent Engagement Chart and Rationale
Download Sample Talent Engagement Chart and Rationale. Note how the Rationale statement describes each employee’s performance and level of alignment with the company’s core values, and also indicates the manager’s plans for supervising each employee in the future.
Instructions
Use the Four Quadrants Matrix above as a framework to assess your direct reports in your current workplace. If you have no direct reports, use a group of individuals with whom you are familiar. Create a Talent Engagement Chart, like the sample chart provided, with a row for each employee.
· Include an Introduction and a Conclusion
· Include 4 to 6 employees from your workplace in your chart, using first names only
· List and clearly define the core values you will use to assess your employees
· For each employee, create a row in the chart
Your task is to select one Quadrant for each employee and to indicate the placement that you chose in the Type column. Think carefully about the core values of your company and use them to assess these employees. Use the format below to organize your assignment:
Introduction
·
· Briefly explain the purpose of the overall Talent Engagement exercise.
· Describe the company’s core values that you will use to assess your employees.
Chart
·
· Include your Talent Engagement Chart here. Use the sample chart provided in this assignment as a model for your chart format.
Rationale Statement
Write a Rationale statement of 4 to 6 paragraphs. For each employee:
·
· Explain why you positioned them in the selected quadrant
· Assess their work and describe how well they align with the core values
· Identify areas for improvement or professional development
· Indicate your plans for managing the employee in the future
Note:
In writing your Rationale, use the sample statement provided in this assignment as a guide.
Conclusion
·
· Reflect on your experience using this Talent Matrix tool. Was the exercise beneficial?
· Would you use some similar tool as a manager in the future? Why or why not?
Submission Requirements
· The assignment is typed and double-spaced, with a professional font (size 10 – 12)
· The assignment is submitted in MS Word document format
· Includes a Cover Page with the assignment title, your name, the professor’s name, course title, and date
· Includes an Introduction and a Conclusion
· Includes a Talent Engagement Chart, with a row for each employee
· Includes a Rationale statement of 4 to 6 paragraphs
· The assignment is written in a formal manner, with correct spelling and grammar
· References are included and provide appropriate information that enables the reader to locate the original source
· Citations and references must follow the formatting instructions found in the
JWMI Writing Standards Guide. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
|
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria (1) |
||
|
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria (1) |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
25% view longer description |
1 pts Honors Creates a Talent Engagement Chart with 4-6 employees and excellently defines the values you will use to assess your employees. 0.86 pts High Pass Creates a Talent Engagement Chart with 4-6 employees and and fully defines the values you will use to assess your employees. 0.77 pts Pass Creates a Talent Engagement Chart with 4-6 employees and adequately defines the values you will use to assess your employees. 0.67 pts Low Pass Creates a Talent Engagement Chart but includes too few employees or does not fully explain the values you will use to assess employees. 0.31 pts Unsatisfactory Does not create a Talent Engagement Chart with 4-6 employees. Does not define the values you will use to assess your employees. |
/ 1 pts |
|
15% view longer description |
0.6 pts Honors Assigns all of the employees to a Positioning quadrant and provides an excellent variety of types. 0.52 pts High Pass Assigns all of the employees to a Positioning quadrant and provides some variety of types. 0.46 pts Pass Assigns all of the employees to a Positioning quadrant but does not provide much variety of types. 0.4 pts Low Pass Assigns some but not all of the employees to a Positioning quadrant. 0.19 pts Unsatisfactory Does not assign each employee to a Positioning quadrant. |
/ 0.6 pts |
|
25% view longer description |
1 pts Honors Writes an excellent assessment for all employees, with thorough review of past performance and analysis of why you placed each one in the particular quadrant. 0.86 pts High Pass Writes a good assessment for all employees, with thoughtful analysis of why you placed each one in the particular quadrant. 0.77 pts Pass Writes a satisfactory assessment for all employees and explains clearly why you placed each one in the particular quadrant. 0.67 pts Low Pass Writes an assessment for some but not all employees, or provides a poor explanation of why you placed each one in the particular quadrant. 0.31 pts Unsatisfactory Does not write an assessment for each employee, explaining clearly why you placed each one in the particular quadrant. |
/ 1 pts |
|
25% view longer description |
1 pts Honors Writes an excellent description, that clearly identifies areas for improvement or development, and indicates plans for future management of each employee. 0.86 pts High Pass Writes a good description, that clearly identifies areas for improvement or development, and indicates plans for future management of each employee. 0.77 pts Pass Writes a satisfactory description, that clearly identifies areas for improvement or development, and indicates plans for future management of each employee. 0.67 pts Low Pass Clearly identifies areas for improvement or development and indicates plans for future management of some, but not all, of the employees. 0.31 pts Unsatisfactory Does not clearly identify areas for improvement or development, or does not indicate plans for future management of the employees. |
/ 1 pts |
|
10% view longer description |
0.4 pts Honors Minimal minor mechanical errors; writing is excellent and succinct, with a clear, coherent flow; student follows formatting instructions. 0.34 pts High Pass Few mechanical errors; writing is good with a clear and coherent flow; student follows formatting instructions. 0.31 pts Pass Some mechanical errors; writing is adequate has a clear flow; student follows formatting instructions. 0.27 pts Low Pass Mechanical errors; writing has an unclear flow; student does not fully follow formatting instructions. 0.12 pts Unsatisfactory Mechanical errors; writing has an unclear flow; student fails to follow formatting instructions. |
/ 0.4 pts |
|
Total Points: 0 |
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more