Elon Musk’s ‘hardcore’ management style: a case
study in what not to do

ProQuest document link

FULL TEXT
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Libby (Elizabeth) Sander, MBA Director &Assistant Professor of
Organisational Behaviour, Bond Business School, Bond University

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 1 of 10

Jae C. Hong/AP
As a case study in how to implement organisational change, Elon Musk’s actions at Twitter will go down as the gold
standard in what not to do.

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 2 of 10

Among other things, the evidence shows successful organisational change requires: a clear, compelling vision that
is communicated effectively; employee participation; and fairness in the way change is implemented. Trust in
leaders is also crucial.
Musk, the world’s richest man, appears in a hurry to make Twitter into a money-spinner. But it takes time to
understand the requirements for successful organisational change. Two in three such efforts fail, resulting in
significant costs, a stressed workforce and loss of key talent.
Change management never quite goes to plan. It’s hard to figure out whether Musk even has a plan at all.
Musk’s ‘extremely hardcore’ style

Since taking over Twitter on October 27, Musk has stopped employees working from home, cancelled employee
lunches, and laid off about 3,700 employees –roughly half of Twitter’s workforce. Many realised they had been
sacked when they could no longer access their laptops.
Just days later it emerged that Musk had a team of snoopers comb through employees’ private messages on Slack,
firing those who had criticised him.
Then, on Wednesday last week, Musk sent an ultimatum to staff to pledge commitment to a new “extremely
hardcore” Twitter that “will mean working long hours at a high intensity”. Employees had until 5pm the next day to
accept, or take a severance package.
About 500 staff reportedly wrote farewell messages.

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 3 of 10

Twitter, CC BY
Musk appears not to have anticipated this reaction. As the “hardcore” deadline approached, he started bringing key
staff into meetings, trying to convince them to stay.

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 4 of 10

He also walked back his working-from-home ban, emailing staff that “all that is required for approval is that your
manager takes responsibility for ensuring that you are making an excellent contribution”.
It was unsuccessful. So many employees decided to leave that on Friday Twitter locked all staff out of its office until
Monday amid confusion as to who actually still worked there and should have access.

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 5 of 10

Twitter has lost more than half its workforce in less than a month. Jeff Chiu/AP
Layoffs and restructuring are common in organisational change. But the way they are managed has significant
effects on those who are leaving, as well as those who remain. If you want employees to be committed and to

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 6 of 10

respond to a crisis, telling them they are lazy and threatening them won’t help.
Read more: Thinking of breaking up with Twitter? Here’s the right way to do it
Choice matters

But what about SpaceX and Tesla –the companies on which Musk has built his fame and fortune? Doesn’t their
success prove he is a good leader?
Not so fast. There is a big difference between a mission-driven company like SpaceX and a platform like Twitter.
When there is a common mission to achieve something extraordinary or which hasn’t been done before, employees
will often willingly work extremely long hours in difficult situations.
They will choose to go above and beyond and work long hours if they feel aligned with the organisation’s purpose or
that their work matters. But the key point here is that they choose.
As one Twitter employee tweeted after Musk’s “hardcore” email:
I didn’t want to work for someone who threatened us over email multiple times about only ‘exceptional tweeps
should work here’ when I was already working 60-70 hours weekly.
Musk ignores the fundamentals

Both Tesla and SpaceX have many unhappy employees, with lawsuits filed over working conditions and Musk’s
management style.
He has been commended for his thinking on iterative design and solving engineering problems. Challenging old
models that may no longer be useful is important. But the fundamentals of leadership and organisational change are
still essential –and on these, Musk falls woefully short.
Read more: What Elon Musk’s destruction of Twitter tells us about the future of social media
While his employees –real people who aren’t billionaires and who have rent or mortgages to pay –were grappling
with what being “hardcore” even means, and how that might impact their ability to have a life outside work, Musk
was tweeting about his poll on whether former US president Donald Trump should be allowed back on the platform.
Then, after Trump declined to return, Musk tweeted the following:

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 7 of 10

The idea of any other chief executive sending such a message on social media almost defies belief.
Read more: Twitter and Elon Musk: why free speech absolutism threatens human rights
Some have suggested this whole debacle is an ego trip for Musk –a theory lent credence by his attempt to get out of

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 8 of 10

the deal. His actions pose a significant risk to the business even if there are still enough employees around to keep it
working.
Twitter’s former head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, who resigned on November 10, wrote last week:
Almost immediately upon the acquisition’s close, a wave of racist and antisemitic trolling emerged on Twitter. Wary
marketers, including those at General Mills, Audi and Pfizer, slowed down or paused ad spending on the platform,
kicking off a crisis within the company to protect precious ad revenue.
But even more powerful than the advertisers, Roth noted, are the digital storefronts of Apple and Google:
Failure to adhere to Apple’s and Google’s guidelines would be catastrophic, risking Twitter’s expulsion from their app
stores and making it more difficult for billions of potential users to get Twitter’s services.
Organisations are complex, interdependent systems, underpinned by a web of behavioural processes. Creating
successful change requires aligning individual, work group and organisational goals.
Even if the little blue bird is still flying for now, the people-led systems that keep it aloft are under significant threat.

Libby (Elizabeth) Sander does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or
organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic
appointment.
– ref. Elon Musk’s ‘hardcore’ management style: a case study in what not to do – https://theconversation.com/elon-
musks-hardcore-management-style-a-case-study-in-what-not-to-do-194999

DETAILS

Subject: Management styles; Employees; Social networks; Case studies; Workforce

Business indexing term: Subject: Management styles Employees Social networks Workforce

People: Musk, Elon

Company / organization: Name: Space Exploration Technologies Corp; NAICS: 336414, 336415

Publication title: EveningReport.nz; Auckland

Publication year: 2022

Publication date: Nov 23, 2022

Publisher: Athena Information Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Place of publication: Auckland

Country of publication: India, Auckland

Source type: Newspaper

Language of publication: English

Document type: News

ProQuest document ID: 2738605198

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 9 of 10

LINKS
Linking Service

Database copyright  2023 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest

Document URL: https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/elon-musks-hardcore-management-style-case-
study/docview/2738605198/se-2?accountid=28844

Copyright: Copyright 2022 Multimedia Investments Ltd, distributed by Contify.com

Last updated: 2022-11-22

Database: ProQuest One Academic

PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 10 of 10