The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Assessment 4: Case Study
Due date: Week 12
Group/individual: Individual
Word count/Time provided: 1500 words
Weighting: 15%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4, ULO5
Assessment 4 Details
Case Study:
XYZ restaurant owner wishes to extend his current operation by adding a new webpage to the
existing web site to setup an online ordering system for Takeaway Orders. This new page should
have a scrolling menu and an online messaging capability to Chat with the customers.
He also requires a new PC with fast internet connection to be supplied at the restaurant’s takeaway
counter.
The idea is that customers will send their requests via online messaging system (chat window). On
duty staff receives the order, communicates with the customer, and confirms the customer’s order
and pick-up time. A confirmation email/text message will be sent to the customer and the relevant
staff. Afterwards, the order will follow the normal process for takeaway orders.
You are required to prepare a Project Proposal/charter covering the following requirements.
1) Create a table listing at least five Objectives (in business terms) for this project as you would
word them in the Project Proposal/Charter.
2) Develop work breakdown structure (WBS) of the case study featuring 3-5 levels and 10-20
boxes.
3) Create a Chart or Table, listing all the major tasks, in sequence, and show all dependencies.
4) Draw a network diagram showing all the tasks and their dependencies (abbreviate their
names if necessary). Arrange the tasks to achieve the shortest time to complete the project
and determine the number of weeks it will take to complete the project.
5) Calculate the slack or float time for each activity, on the understanding that many tasks can
be run in parallel if dependencies permit.
6) Finally, list the task numbers that form the critical path.
Assessments 4 Conditions of Using AI
Please refer to conditions of using AI in your assessment provided in the Academic Integrity Module
in the page titled Generative AI: Guidelines for Students.
Assessments 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 15% of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 4 (Case Study) Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory
(0-49% of the criterion
mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64% of the criterion
mark)
Good
(65-74% of the criterion
mark)
Very Good
(75-84% of the criterion
mark)
Excellent
(85-100% of the criterion
mark)
Project Proposal/Charter
(10 marks)
Inadequate
understanding of
Project
Proposal/Charter
Basic knowledge of
Project
Proposal/Charter with
some mistakes
Good understanding of
Project Proposal/Charter
accurate exhibition with
minor mistakes
Very good and
accurate
understanding of
Project
Proposal/Charter
Excellent
understanding of
Project
Proposal/Charter
Develop and use Breakdown
Structure
(10 marks)
Inadequate
understanding of
developing and using
breakdown structure
Unable to describe
concepts in own words
Basic knowledge of
developing and using
breakdown structure
limited depth of basic
concepts
Good understanding of
developing and using
breakdown structure
Exhibits breadth and
depth
Very good and
accurate
understanding of
breakdown structure
Exhibits accurate,
Detailed breadth and
depth
Excellent
understanding of
breakdown structure
Provide Major Tasks and
Dependency Table/Chart
20 marks)
Inadequate
understanding of Major
Tasks and Dependency
Table
Basic understanding of
Major Tasks and
Dependency Table
with some mistakes
Good understanding of
Major Tasks and
Dependency Table
accurate exhibition with
minor mistakes
Very good and
accurate
understanding of
Major Tasks and
Dependency Table
Excellent
understanding of Major
Tasks and Dependency
Table
Draw Network Diagram of Tasks
(20 marks)
Inadequate
understanding of
Network Diagram
Basic understanding of
Network Diagram with
some mistakes
Good understanding of
Network Diagram
accurate exhibition with
minor mistakes
Very good and
accurate
understanding of
Network Diagram
Excellent
understanding of
Network Diagram
Calculate the slack or float time for
each activity and Depict Critical Path
(20 marks)
Inadequate
understanding of
Critical Path
Basic understanding of
Critical Path with some
mistakes
Good understanding of
Critical Path
accurate exhibition with
minor mistakes
Very good and
accurate
understanding of
Critical Path
Excellent
understanding of
Critical Path
Academic Writing Skills (10 marks) –
Free of any grammatical errors; using
correct sentence structure; applying
an extensive range of vocabulary; –
Proper introduction and conclusion.
The writing is poor with
no logical flow and has
grammatical errors.
Information is limited,
unclear and the depth
The writing is
satisfactory and
exhibits majority of
grammatically correct
sentences that are
The writing has good
structure exhibiting
grammatically correct
sentences, appropriate
punctuation with some
The writing has very
good structure
exhibiting
grammatically correct
sentences,
The writing has
excellent structure and
presentation exhibiting
fluent, coherent, and
grammatically correct
is not adequately
developed.
The idea is a simple
restatement of the
topic.
Demonstration of a
limited sense of
purpose or theme
Insufficient
understanding of the
topic.
appropriately
punctuated with some
spelling or typing errors
The writing does not go
far enough in expanding
key issues/ concepts.
The writing requires
further information to
clarify main arguments.
spellings or typing errors
appropriate
punctuation with few
spellings or typing
error
The writing is used to
support the main
ideas and convince
the reader of the
argument who is left
in no doubt of the
purpose.
sentences
well punctuated with
no minor spelling or
typing error
The writing perceives a
sense of the wider
context of the ides
Report Structure, Presentation,
referencing (10 marks) – Consistent
formatting with suitable headings
and sub- headings – Consistent use of
labels, highlights, font weight and
underline, Reference list –
Appropriate Referencing using
HARVARD guidelines
The writing shows
insufficient application
of Harvard referencing
Harvard style
The writing shows no
in-text citation
In-text citation does to
match with citation
under Reference list
Report is not formatted
and structured
The writing shows
inconsistent application
of Harvard referencing
style
In-text citation match
with the citation under
Reference list
Satisfactory Report
structure, presentation,
and formatting
The writing shows good
application of Harvard
referencing style with some
errors in referencing
Good Report structure,
presentation, and
formatting to large extent.
The writing shows
very good
application of
Harvard referencing
style with few errors
in referencing
Very good Report
structure,
presentation, and
formatting
The writing shows
excellent application of
Harvard referencing
style with no error in
referencing
Excellent Report
structure, presentation,
and formatting.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more