The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The introductory
paragraph provides
a brief yet thorough
overall summary of
the article and/or
study conducted.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The introductory paragraph
provides a brief yet adequate
overall summary of the
article and/or study.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The introductory
paragraph provides
a vague summary
of the article and/or
study. It does not
show a clear
understanding of
the article/study.
0 pts
Not Present
An introductory
paragraph is
not included.
5 pts
Communication 20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly
addresses
communication
assertions related to
individuals with ASD
from the article
clearly and
concisely; At least 1
direct link to the
course text is
provided.
17 to >13 pts
Proficient
Adequately addresses
communication assertions
related to individuals with
ASD from the article clearly
and concisely; At least 1
implied link to the course text
is provided.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Communication
assertions from the
article are vague or
do not relate to
individuals with
ASD; No link to
course text is
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
Communication
aspects are not
addressed.
20 pts
Behavior 20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly
addresses
behavioral
assertions related to
individuals with ASD
from the article
clearly and
concisely; At least 1
direct link to the
course text is
provided.
17 to >13 pts
Proficient
Adequately addresses
behavioral assertions related
to individuals with ASD from
the article clearly and
concisely; At least 1 implied
link to the course text is
provided.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Behavioral
assertions from the
article are vague or
do not relate to
individuals with
ASD; No link to
course text is
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
Behavioral
aspects are not
addressed.
20 pts
Article Review Grading Rubric | EDSP367_D01_202340
Criteria Ratings Points
Social Skills 20 to >17 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly
addresses social
skills assertions
related to
individuals with ASD
from the article
clearly and
concisely; At least 1
direct link to the
course text is
provided.
17 to >13 pts
Proficient
Adequately addresses social
skills assertions related to
individuals with ASD from
the article clearly and
concisely; At least 1 implied
link to the course text is
provided.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Social skills
assertions from the
article are vague or
do not relate to
individuals with
ASD; No link to
course text is
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
Social skills
aspects are not
addressed.
20 pts
Conclusion 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The closing
paragraph
thoroughly ties the
review altogether
and provides a clear
understanding of
the answer to the
key question for the
article review.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The closing paragraph
adequately ties the review
altogether and provides a
clear understanding of the
answer to the key question
for the article review.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The closing
paragraph is
somewhat vague
and does not
clearly tie together
or provide a clear
understanding of
the answer to the
key question for the
article review.
0 pts
Not Present
A closing
paragraph is
not included.
5 pts
Current APA
Format &
Research and
Sources
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Uses current APA
format, includes a
reference page, and
a minimum of 3
in-text citations. The
article was written
less than 5 years
ago and relates to
ASD.
13 to >10 pts
Proficient
Minor errors in current APA
formatting with 1-2 in-text
citations included. The article
was written less than 5 years
ago and relates to ASD.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Multiple errors in
current APA
formatting with no
in-text citations
included. The
article was written
more than 5 years
ago and relates to
ASD.
0 pts
Not Present
Current APA
format is not
used. The
article does not
relate to Autism
or address any
of the
headings.
15 pts
Article Review Grading Rubric | EDSP367_D01_202340
Criteria Ratings Points
Spelling &
Grammar and
Word Count
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
There are no
spelling or grammar
errors. The word
meets the 2-page
length requirement.
13 to >10 pts
Proficient
There are only a couple of
minor spelling or grammar
errors. The word adequately
meets the 2-page length
requirement in which it either
exceeds or is less than the
requirement by only a few
words. The review is on the
assigned topic.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
There are several
noticeable spelling
or grammar errors.
The length
requirement is
somewhat met but
thoughts seem
randomly
organized.
0 pts
Not Present
There are
numerous
spelling and
grammar
errors. The
length
requirement is
not met, or the
review is not on
the assigned
topic.
15 pts
Total Points: 100
Article Review Grading Rubric | EDSP367_D01_202340
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more