The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Presentation/PPT
27/08/2022
HIS 200 Module Five Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The short response activities in the webtext throughout this course are designed to show your understanding of key concepts as you engage with course content.
Prompt
During the �fth week of the course, you will respond to several questions in the webtext as you complete each learning block. At the end of Module Five, you will review your answers to these
questions and ensure that you have responded to each question. It is important that you answer each question, otherwise, the words “[no response]” will appear in brackets when you submit
the assignment. The questions and their original locations in the webtext are listed in this table in case you want to refer back to the reading as you edit, but you can edit your responses to all
the questions directly in Module Five: Analyzing History, learning block 5-4 (page 5) in the webtext, before exporting to Word for submission to your instructor in the learning environment.
Module Five: Analyzing History, Learning Block 5-1 (page 1):
Question 1: In the space below, specify which historical lens you would like to use for this exercise.
Question 2: Next, formulate a research question about the civil rights movement (historical time from 1954–1968), using the lens you have chosen.
Module Five: Analyzing History, Learning Block 5-1 (page 2):
Question 3: First, go back and review the research question you developed in Step 1. For Step 2, �rst name two different primary sources that you might use to answer that question. Be
as speci�c as you can. Your primary sources should be found using the Shapiro Library.
Question 4: Next, name two different secondary sources you could use to answer your research question. Again, be as speci�c as you can. Your secondary sources should be found using
the Shapiro Library.
Module Five: Analyzing History, Learning Block 5-1 (page 3):
Question 5: Construct a thesis statement that provides an answer to the research question you posed in Step 1. Base your response on the historical evidence that has been presented in
this course so far, as well as any research you may have done on your own.
Module Five: Analyzing History, Learning Block 5-3 (pages 2–3):
Question 6: Name three speci�c historical events that can be considered contributory causes of the passage of the Voting Rights Act. Brie�y explain why you believe each of these events
contributed to the passage of the Act.
Question 7: Based on what you read about the passage of the Voting Rights Act on page 1 of this learning block, name one event that was part of the course of this bill’s passage by
Congress.
Question 8: Name three speci�c consequences caused by the passage of the Voting Rights Act.
Question 9: One of these scholars relied heavily on evidence about the substance of today’s political debate. Which scholar was that? What sort of evidence did he use?
Question 10: One of these scholars relied heavily on evidence about the political process. Which scholar was that? What sort of evidence did he use?
Module Five: Analyzing History, Learning Block 5-4 (page 5):
Question 11:
1. What is the topic of this essay? Does the author make it clear in the introduction?
2. What is the author’s thesis?
3. What kind of sources and evidence do you think the author will use to support his thesis?
What to Submit
Your response to Questions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 should be 1–2 sentences in length. Your response to Questions 9, 10, and 11 should be 2–3 sentences in length. Follow the instructions at the
bottom of Module Five: Analyzing History, learning block 5-4 (page 5) in the webtext, to download your work and submit it to your instructor as a single Microsoft Word document uploaded to
the learning environment. Refer to the Submitting Webtext Assignments Guide for assistance on downloading, saving, and submitting this assignment.
Module Five Short Response Rubric
Criteria Exemplary Pro�cient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Engagement Written responses completely
address all short answer
prompts (100%)
Written responses completely
address the majority of short
answer prompts (85%)
Written responses address the
minority of short answer
prompts (55%)
No written responses provided
to address any short answer
prompts (0%)
30
Relevance N/A Written responses directly
address short answer prompts,
drawing from presented course
concepts and
terminology (100%)
Written responses are topically
related to short answer
prompts, but responses do not
consistently draw from
presented course concepts and
terminology (85%)
Written responses do not
address topics identi�ed in
short answer prompts (0%)
20
Criteria Exemplary Pro�cient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Accuracy Written responses are
completely accurate (100%)
Written responses contain
minor errors but are mostly
accurate (85%)
Written responses contain
major errors (55%)
No written responses are
provided (0%)
20
Critical Thinking N/A Written responses
demonstrate understanding of
course content through
inclusion of original ideas and
examples (100%)
Written responses
demonstrate understanding of
course content through
reiteration of provided
materials, but do not
consistently include original
ideas and examples (85%)
Written responses do not
re�ect original ideas and
examples (0%)
20
Articulation of Response N/A Written responses are
captured in complete sentences
without grammatical errors
impacting legibility and the
clarity of response (100%)
Written responses are
captured in incomplete
sentences or include numerous
grammatical errors that
negatively impact legibility and
the clarity of response (85%)
No written responses are
captured in complete
sentences (0%)
10
Total: 100%
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more