The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
In this Discussion we’ll reflect on Wikipedia, one of the top ten most visited websites in the world.
Review the audio file below, which will direct you to the links just beneath it. After reviewing the file, proceed to the Discussion prompt (below).
The links below will open in a new window.
1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=279384468
2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Jarre
3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280510606
4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280558491
5.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280558753#Quotes
6.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280629550
7.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280649291#Quotes
8.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280872760
9.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Jarre&oldid=280893979
10.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/mar/31/maurice-jarre-obituary
11.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30699302/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/student-hoaxes-worlds-media-wikipedia/#.WxNYbu4vypo
Respond to the story.
Think about the story narrated in the audio file and illustrated in the links. What is this story about? Is it about problems with Wikipedia? Is it a story about problems with the internet? Is it a story about problems with traditional newspapers? Is it a story about an individual act of vandalism? Maybe some combination of all of these?
Explain.
Remember that in the Discussions we are practicing “microstyle.” (If you need a quick review, here is a link to last week’s microstyle reading.) For your first reply in our Wikipedia discussion, write a subject line that forecasts a point you are focusing on in your reply. Here are a couple of examples of effective Discussion 3 subject lines written by past ILR260 students:
“Where were the fact checkers?”
“Hoaxster makes point but isn’t blameless”
Reply to at least two classmates.
Respond to the Discussion prompt (5 points)
Edit subject line to forecast specific content of response (1 point)
Reply to two classmates (4 points)
To go to the Week 3 Discussion board, follow the “Week 3 Discussion” link located under Week 3. Then “Reply” to the prompt to post your initial response.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more